This website uses cookies to provide you with the best possible service. By continuing to use this website, you accept the use of cookies. However, you can change your browser’s cookie settings at any time. You can find further information in our updated data privacy statement.

Perspective

Revision of the Road Traffic Act (Almost) Paves the Way for Automated Driving in Germany

June 13, 2017| By Mathias Schubert | Auto/Motor, General Liability | English | Deutsch

Region: Germany

On May 12 the Upper House of the German Federal Parliament (Bundesrat) approved amendments to the Road Traffic Act (RTA) setting legal requirements for automated driving beyond “partial automation” in Germany. The revised legislation came into effect on June 21.

The revised Act, which passed the Lower House of Parliament (Bundestag) in late March, allows drivers to operate cars with Level 3 and 4 functionality, i.e., “conditional automation” and “high automation” according to the international nomenclature1 (described below).

Levels of Automated Driving

The new law states that the driver remains legally in control of the vehicle, even when Level 3 or 4 automated functionality is engaged. However, once the law is in effect, drivers using Level 3 or 4 functionality will be free to turn away from the traffic environment and vehicle control, provided they maintain a sufficient level of alertness so that they can resume control when prompted to do so or when the system is recognizably beyond its performance limits.

All vehicles with Level 3 and 4 functionality will be fitted with a “black box” that will record the data of each journey. In the event of an accident, the data will be used to ascertain whether the driver or the automated system was in control of the vehicle.

The law will be reviewed in or after 2019 to account for any technological changes, as well as to allow for a possible rethink of the liability regime. Currently, the German RTA imposes strict liability on the keeper (typically the owner or the lessee) of the vehicle; in addition, the driver is liable on the basis of a refutable presumption of fault. The Upper House of the German Parliament (though unsuccessful) also recommended extending strict liability under the RTA to manufacturers of vehicles equipped with Level 3 and 4 automated driving functionality – a position consistent with my own view.2

The issue of data protection – with regard to the driving information recorded during each journey – will also be revisited.

The revised RTA has been warmly welcomed by the German auto industry, not least because it lays the foundations for the development of a legal framework for fully autonomous (driverless) vehicles in the future.

For now, there are still some barriers to overcome. Revisions of the legal requirements under international Type Approval regulations are still pending. ECE-R 79, which regulates steering equipment and currently allows automated steering only at speeds not exceeding 12 kilometers per hour (10 km plus 20% tolerance), remains of particular relevance.3

However, given that a study commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy predicted that by 2025 the German market for driver assistance systems and automated vehicles will be worth EUR 8.8 billion and create nearly 130,000 jobs, there are many factions with a vested interest in ensuring progress continues to be made.

(Blog updated June 22 for completeness.)

Endnotes
  1. The revised Road Traffic Act does not follow the SAE nomenclature commonly used in the international context. The reason is that the German Federal Highway Research Institute or “BASt” (Bundesanstalt für Strassenwesen) decided a few years ago to adopt “labels” for the levels of automation that differ in part from those used by the SAE. Thankfully, the narrative used for the various levels is very similar.

    While the revised RTA follows the BASt nomenclature, in order to avoid confusion for international readers, the SAE nomenclature has been used in this article. The table below juxtaposes the “labels” for both nomenclatures.
  2. Schubert, Autonomous Cars, Initial Thoughts About Reforming the Liability Regime, Insurance Issues, May 2015, p. 4 – 5, considering absolute product liability (no defect required) as an alternative.
  3. Lutz, Automated Vehicles in the EU: Proposals to Amend the Type Approval Framework and Regulation of Driver Conduct, Casualty Matters, March 2016

 

Stay Up to Date. Subscribe Today.

Contributors

Get to know our global experts

View Contributors